Eye Health Insider Editorial Team

What We Do

Eye Health Insider is an independent publication. We review eye-health dietary supplements by reading the primary research — not the manufacturer's marketing copy. Every factual claim in our articles is traced to a peer-reviewed study, a recognized clinical authority (NIH, AAO, NEI), or a published clinical trial before it goes live.

We don't have financial relationships with supplement manufacturers. Our revenue comes from affiliate commissions when readers purchase products — always disclosed before the first link, never hidden in fine print. A commission doesn't buy a positive review; if a product doesn't hold up under scrutiny, we say so.

Our Review Criteria

Every supplement we evaluate is assessed against seven criteria:

1. Ingredient doses. Are the active doses at or near what clinical studies actually used? A supplement can list lutein on the label at 1 mg and technically be "AREDS2-inspired" — we check whether it uses the studied 10 mg dose.
2. Ingredient form. Bioavailability varies by form. We check whether the version used (free-form vs. esterified lutein, chelated vs. oxide minerals) matches what the research examined.
3. Manufacturing standards. GMP certification, FDA-registered facility, US manufacture — we verify these claims, not assume them.
4. Primary source backing. Every ingredient claim is traced to a PubMed-indexed study, a clinical trial database entry, or a recognized institution (NIH, AAO, JAMA). We don't cite manufacturer-funded press releases as science.
5. Disease claim compliance. We flag any formula making drug-like claims ("treats macular degeneration", "cures dry eye"). These violate FDA/DSHEA guidelines and are a red flag for the entire product.
6. Transparency. Full ingredient label with doses disclosed? If a company hides behind a proprietary blend, we note it — you can't evaluate a formula you can't see.
7. Refund policy. A meaningful money-back guarantee indicates the manufacturer has confidence in the product. We note the length and terms.

The Research We Cite

Our primary sources include:

• AREDS2 trial (NIH, n=4,203, JAMA 2013) — the reference study for AMD supplementation
• Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS) — the leading peer-reviewed journal in vision research
• JAMA Ophthalmology — clinical trial results and systematic reviews
• PubMed / PMC (National Library of Medicine) — full-text access to indexed studies
• National Eye Institute (NEI) and NIH Office of Dietary Supplements — federal evidence summaries
• Frontiers in Nutrition / Frontiers in Immunology — emerging gut-eye connection research
• UCL, Harvard Medical School, University College London — institutional research on microbiome-retina pathways

We also reference published military research on eye health — including the U.S. Air Force Vision Center of Excellence and publicly available military medical databases — when relevant to the supplement mechanisms under review.

What We Are Not

Eye Health Insider is a supplement review publication, not a medical practice. Nothing on this site is medical advice. Our team does not diagnose, treat, or prescribe. We evaluate evidence and explain it in plain language — the clinical decisions remain yours to make with your ophthalmologist.

We are not affiliated with any supplement manufacturer. We have no financial relationship with VisiFlora, ClickBank, or any product we cover beyond the standard affiliate commission disclosed on every page.